Rubric scoring lets you break a review down into named criteria — each with its own scoring range and its own weight — instead of asking reviewers for a single overall number. Set it up from a project’s Review Panels tab: add a criterion, give it a Max score and a Weight, and repeat for each thing you want scored. Dapple normalises every score to a 0–100 scale and combines them into one weighted average automatically. Use rubric scoring when different aspects of a submission matter by different amounts and you need reviewers to score consistently.
What is rubric scoring in Dapple?
Rubric scoring replaces a single “give it a score out of 10” question with a set of named criteria, each configured separately on the Review Panel. A typical rubric might use three or four criteria such as "originality", "technical ability" or "audience fit" — each scored on its own star rating. Every criterion has its own description, so reviewers know what a 3 looks like versus a 9, and its own Max score, so you can give one criterion a wider range (Technical Ability out of 10) and another a narrower one (Presentation out of 5).
Reviewers score each criterion on its own rather than holding every factor in their head at once, and Dapple does the math to turn those individual scores into one final number out of 100. This keeps reviewers focused on the specific thing they’re being asked to judge, and keeps their raw scores comparable to each other.
How does Dapple calculate the weighted average?
Each criterion’s score is normalised to a 0–100 scale using score ÷ max score × 100, then multiplied by its weight. Dapple sums those weighted results across all criteria and divides by the total weight to produce the weighted average shown on the submission.
For example:
Criterion | Score | Max score | Weight |
Originality | 6 | 10 | 1 |
Technical Ability | 8 | 10 | 2 |
Audience Fit | 9 | 10 | 3 |
Normalised: Originality = 60, Technical Ability = 80, Audience Fit = 90. Weighted sum = (60×1) + (80×2) + (90×3) = 490. Total weight = 6. Weighted average = 490 ÷ 6 = 81.7 out of 100. Because weights are ratios rather than absolute values, 1/2/3 produces exactly the same result as 10/20/30.
How do I set up a rubric on a Review Panel?
Set criteria up once on the Review Panel and every reviewer scores against the same rubric.
Open the project and go to Review Panels (next to Settings, Stages, and Form Builder).
Click Add criterion.
Set Type to Score.
Enter a Criterion name and a short description telling reviewers what they’re scoring and what a high versus low score looks like.
Set Max score — the top of the star rating reviewers will see (for example, Max 10).
Set Weight — how much this criterion should count towards the overall weighted average relative to the others.
Repeat Add criterion for each thing you want scored.
Save.
Once the Review Panel is live, reviewers see each criterion as a star rating on their review form, and the weighted average out of 100 appears automatically once every criterion has been scored.
Why weight some criteria more than others?
Weight controls how much a criterion influences the overall weighted average — it doesn’t change the scoring range reviewers see, only how much that criterion counts once every score is combined. A criterion with weight 2 counts twice as much as one with weight 1; a criterion with weight 3 counts three times as much. All weights are relative, so 1/2/3 works the same as 10/20/30.
Use unequal weights when one part of a submission matters more to your decision than another. If publishability matters far more than flair, giving Publishability a weight of 3 against Flair’s weight of 1 means a reviewer can’t let a flashy but unpublishable entry accidentally outscore a solid one — the maths won’t let it.
What are good use cases for rubric scoring?
Rubric scoring works best anywhere a single overall score would flatten out real differences between submissions.
Use case | Why rubric scoring helps |
Awards and competitions | Separates subjective originality from objective technical execution, so panels don’t just reward whoever presents best. |
Grant and funding applications | Scores impact, feasibility, and budget separately, and weights the one your funder cares about most. |
Creative open calls | Scores originality and craft independently, then blends them into one comparable ranking. |
Accelerator and pitch programmes | Breaks a pitch into team, market, and product, so a strong founder doesn’t mask a weak product. |
Best practice
Keep it to 3–5 criteria — more than that and reviewers start rushing through them, which defeats the purpose.
Write a description for every criterion. A bare "Audience Fit” label means something different to every reviewer; a sentence telling them what to look for doesn’t.
Use a consistent Max score across criteria (for example, all out of 10) unless you have a specific reason not to — it makes the star ratings easier to compare at a glance.
Reserve your highest weight for the criterion that should actually decide close calls, not just the one that feels most important.
Run one test review before opening the Review Panel to your full panel, to check the weighted average behaves the way you expect.
Tell your reviewers how the weighted average is calculated, so they understand why an unweighted 9 might carry less impact than a weighted 7.
Where to go next
How to set up rubric scoring


